XAT-2019, conducted on 6 January 2019 was overall a smooth affair without any technical glitches.
The test-structure was the same as that of last year and was in two parts: Part-1 and Part-2. Part-1 consisted of 26 questions in Verbal and Logical Ability, 21 questions in Decision Making and 27 questions in Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation (Total 74 questions). Questions in Part 1 carried 1 mark each, and negative marks of 0.25 for each incorrect response. Further, unattempted questions beyond 8 questions attracted a negative marking of 0.1 mark.The questions in Part-1 were to be attempted in 165 minutes without any sectional timings. One move between the different sections freely.
Part-2 consisted of 25 questions on General Knowledge to be attempted in 15 minutes.The negative marking did not apply for Part-2 (General Knowledge section). XAT-2019 did not have an essay, unlike previous years.
Each question had 5 options
Contrary to reports prior to the test, there were no Non-MCQs or the Numerical Answer Type (NAT) questions in the test.
|Section||Number of questions||Time|
|Verbal and Logical Ability||26||165 minutes|
|Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation||27|
|General Knowledge||25||15 minutes|
The Verbal and Logical Ability section of XAT 2019 was reported to be difficult. While this is usually the case in XAT, this time, the section was even tougher in comparison to the previous years. There were 14 Reading Comprehension questions and 12 Verbal Ability/Reasoning questions.
The Verbal ability/Verbal Reasoning questions were predominantly reasoning-based (Critical Reasoning and Jumbled Paragraphs); there were four vocabulary & usage-based questions (Fill in the Blanks). While these were mostly of medium difficulty, there were a few challenging Critical Reasoning questions which required one to identify fallacious arguments. .
The 14 RC questions were distributed among five passages. One of the passages was a short poem and was particularly difficult. The remaining four passages had a mixture of medium to difficult questions. Nearly all the questions were of an inferential nature.
|Area/Questions||No. of Qs.||Question Type||Level of Difficulty|
|Verbal Ability / Reasoning|
|Fill in the blanks (3/4 blanks)||3||Vocabulary-based||3 Medium|
|Jumbled Paragraphs||2||Reasoning-based||1 Medium, 1 Difficult|
|Critical Reasoning||5||Reasoning-based||1 Easy, 1 Medium, 3 Difficult|
|Passage 1 – Poem – Black lake||2||All were Inferential||2 Difficult|
|Passage 2 – Creativity & Mood disorder||3||All were Inferential||1 Medium, 2 Difficult|
|Passage 3 – Women’s speech||3||All were inferential||1 Medium, 2 Difficult|
|Passage 4 – Elevating emotions||3||All were inferential||1 Medium, 2 Difficult|
|Passage 5 – Art appreciation||3||All were inferential||2 Medium, 1 Difficult|
An attempt of about 14-16 questions in this section in about 55 minutes, with about 75-80% accuracy would be considered a good attempt. We expect the cut-off for this section (for the general category) to be around 6-7 for XLRI -BM and XLRI-HRM programs
This section consisted of 21 questions, and unlike last year, none of the questions were quantitative.
This section consisted of 7 sets of 2-4 questions each. Most of the passages were short and easy to read. As usual, some questions had a fair deal of ambiguity – in that either no answer seemed correct or s more than one option appeared correct. Overall, the questions were of medium difficulty. Therefore, the choice of sets/questions to attempt would have depended mainly on your personal preferences and strengths. Overall the section was more difficult compared to last year's test.
|Area/Questions||No. of Qs.||Question Type||Level of Difficulty|
|Case 1 – Principal Bhalla||3||Ethical Dilemma||2 Medium, 1 Difficult|
|Case 2 – Minister Raja Thakur||3||Ethical Dilemma||1 Easy, 1 Medium, 1 Difficult|
|Case 3 – PR Manager/Agency||2||Business Decision||1 Easy, 1 Medium|
|Case 4 – HR Manager||4||Business Decisions||2 Medium, 2 Difficult|
|Case 5 – Ice-Cream Franchise||4||Business Decisions||2 Easy, 2 Medium|
|Case 6 – Sanchit Hospitals||3||Ethical Dilemma||1 Medium, 1 Difficult|
|Case 7 – Electro Auto||2||1 Business Decision & 1 Ethical Dilemma||2 Difficult|
In about 55 minutes, an attempt of about 13-14 questions with about 75-80% accuracy would be considered to be good . We expect the cut-off for this section (for the general category) to be 7-8 for the XLRI -BM program and 6-7 for XLRI-HRM program.
This section was easy to moderate level of difficulty, like in XAT-2018. Out of the 27 questions in the section, 21 were on Quantitative Ability and 6 were on Data Interpretation. This section was dominated by questions on Geometry (8 questions), followed by Arithmetic (5 questions). As per the feedback received from students, there was a confusion between square root and pi sign on the screen. As a result, students had to be extra vigilant. This section had a few sitters, which should not have been left. Some questions were difficult with close options. As per the feedback received from students, one question in one DI set could not be answered because of inadequate/ambiguous data.
Following is the break-up of the questions in the section:
|Quantitative Ability (21 questions)|
|Averages (also included the concept of median)||1||1|
|Profit & Loss||1||1|
|Simple & Compound Interest||1||1|
|Total Modern Maths||1||1||2|
|Data Interpretation (6 questions)|
|Pie chart + Bar chart (Calculations)||3|
An attempt of about 18-19 questions (with about 80 percent accuracy) in about 55 minutes would be considered a good attempt. We expect the cut-off for this section (for the general category) at 9-10 for the XLRI -BM program and 6-7 for XLRI - HRM program
There was NO break between Part I and Part II.
The 25 GK questions comprised 7 current affairs questions and 18 static GK questions. Overall the GK section was difficult. 15 questions were based on national events, 8 questions were based on international events and 2 questions were general. As usual, the questions covered a wide range of ares and gave no special advantage to specialists in any one area. The topics were diverse - Science, History, Geography, Business, Economy, names of political personalities, etc.
As there was no negative marking in this section, all questions should have been attempted. A score of 6 - 7 would be a good score in this section.
Overall, XAT-2019 was one notch more difficult than XAT-2018, mainly due to difficult Verbal and Decision Making sections.
We expect the overall cut-off (for the general category) for the second round of admission for the XLRI BM program at 28-30 and for XLRI-HRM program at 26-28.
Last year the sectional cut offs in the general category for female candidates for both the XLRI -BM program and the XLRI -HRM program were marginally lower.This year too we expect the sectional cut offs for female candidates to be a bit lower.