Rural India Is Left Behind by the Indian Economy: The Divide in Indian Economy

03 January, 2026

ims-india

India today proudly calls itself the world’s fastest-growing major economy. We celebrate unicorn startups, digital payments, record stock markets, expressways, and global recognition. Yet, just a few hundred kilometers away from these symbols of progress lies another India. One where agriculture still depends on monsoons, healthcare access is uncertain, schools struggle with infrastructure, and youth migrate to cities in search of dignity and work. This contrast raises an uncomfortable but important GD question: Has Rural India been left behind by the Indian economy?

With nearly 65% of India’s population still living in rural areas, this question is an economic and social reality.

Has Rural India Been Left Behind by the Indian Economy?

Rural India is not just about villages. It represents agriculture and its allied sectors, informal labour, small-scale industries, traditional livelihoods, and cultural and social stability. Rural India, with 65% of the nation’s 1.4 billion people, is visibly left behind. Drive through the countryside and the evidence appears overwhelming—poor roads, limited electricity, minimal healthcare, inadequate schools. Economic growth, while impressive in numbers, has not been evenly distributed.

Now, the 2025 data paints a picture of rural India simultaneously growing and remaining profoundly unequal. Understanding this nuance of both the abandonment and the opportunity is crucial.

The Evidence that Rural India Is Left Behind

The Consumption Inequality Gap and Income Disparities

The most visible marker of abandonment is consumption inequality. In 2023-24, the rural monthly per capita consumption (MPCE) was about ₹4,000 and urban monthly per capita consumption (MPCE) was about ₹6,500.

A rural household’s entire monthly budget is about ₹4,000 which barely covers basic necessities. An urban household’s budget is about ₹6,500 that allows discretionary spending on entertainment, durables, and travel. This gap means rural households consume at two-thirds the level of urban households. It’s a structural inequality that determines quality of life.

Critically, while this gap has narrowed from 84% in 2011-12 to 70% in 2023-24, the rate of improvement is glacially slow. At this pace, rural-urban consumption parity would take another 30-40 years. For a child born today in rural India, this means spending their entire productive life in material deprivation relative to their urban peer.

The Income and Employment Divergence

The employment structure shows abandonment of rural India in its economy. The rural employment remains trapped in low-productivity activities.

55.3% of rural men work in self-employment (mostly subsistence agriculture).
71.6% of rural women in self-employment (unpaid family work).
Agriculture still dominates (52% of rural workforce), despite only contributing 18% of GDP.

By contrast, urban employment has modernized, where:

47.5% of urban men hold regular salaried jobs (formal, stable, benefits).
55.1% of urban women in salaried employment.
Services dominate urban employment (finance, IT, trade, hospitality).

This structural difference means that a rural worker in subsistence farming faces perpetual income uncertainty and has no social security. An urban services worker has stable income, health insurance, and retirement benefits.

The Jobs Mismatch

From 2011-12 to 2023-24, India added over 150 million jobs. Yet the distribution reveals abandonment of rural job growth. Mostly MGNREGA generates jobs for per day manual work. But, it’s not a prosperity-building work.

Urban job growth is seen with a formal employment in services, IT, and finance.

Rural unemployment goes through the underemployment crisis where most “employed” rural people work part-time, seasonally, or earn near-subsistence. The quality of rural jobs hasn’t improved. While urban unemployment fell to 6.8%, this reflects access to stable, formal positions. Rural desperate people have to accept any work which is seasonal, irregular, and low-paid.

Infrastructure

Rural road density remains critically low despite PM Gram Sadak Yojana investments. While electricity grid coverage improved, 25-30% of rural households still experience frequent outages compared to 8-10% in urban region.

Rural India has 1 primary health center per 100,000 population compared to 1 per 30,000 in urban India. Internet penetration is 45% in rural vs. 75% in urban.

Last-Mile Connectivity: Even with “connected” villages, supply chains struggle to reach rural markets efficiently

These infrastructure deficits aren’t accidental. They reflect consistent underinvestment in rural areas. When a farmer needs medical care, they travel 50+ km to a district hospital. When an urban resident needs care, hospitals exist in their neighborhood. This is structural abandonment written into geography.

The Education and Healthcare

Rural regions lack the institutions creating upward mobility like skilled vocational training centers. They are concentrated in urban areas and quality schools are limited in rural areas. The best teachers migrate to cities.

Tertiary healthcare is essentially absent in villages and 80%+ of specialist doctors practice in cities. Rural youth have to migrate to cities to access colleges and universities. A rural child faces limited pathways to escape poverty. The infrastructure for skill development, education, and healthcare simply doesn’t exist in villages.

The Brain Drain Reality

Young, able, educated rural people are leaving. Rural-urban migration is now a structural phenomenon, not cyclical. Farmers are unable to earn sustainable income and quit farming. 18-year-olds leave for college in cities and never return.

For villages, this means loss of youth, talent, and dynamism. The remaining rural population skews older, less educated, less ambitious. This is the demographic marker of abandonment.

Rural India is Left Behind: Is the Problem About Abandonment or Scale?

India’s challenge isn’t necessarily that rural India is intentionally abandoned, but that investment scale doesn’t match the problem’s magnitude. Billions of rural people require infrastructure equivalent to entire developed nations’ investment.

A GDP growth of 6-7% annually means ₹20-25 lakh crore new economic output and rural receives ~₹2-3 lakh crores. Even with focused investment, closing rural-urban gaps requires 15-20 years minimum.

Why Rural Job Quality Hasn’t Improved:
Rural areas lack the industry and services that create high-quality employment. Manufacturing remains urban. Services concentrate in cities. High-value agriculture (horticulture, precision farming) emerges only where infrastructure exists.

Rural job growth mostly in low-productivity activities (casual labor, subsistence farming). This isn’t abandonment; it’s a structural economic reality that rural areas lack the conditions for high-value job creation.

Why Young Rural People Leave:
Rural youth migration reflects economic rationality, not rural failure. People move to cities for higher incomes (3-4x urban earnings), stable employment, education, and social mobility.

Conclusion: Rural India is Left Behind

Rural India is systematically abandoned by India’s economy because:

Consumption remains 30% below urban.
Employment trapped in subsistence as 55% rural self-employment in low-productivity farming and only 15-20% access formal jobs
Infrastructure deficits persist across roads, electricity, healthcare, and education remain qualitatively inferior to urban.
Opportunity creation is concentrated in cities.
Brain drain is eroding rural dynamism and villages are losing young people, talent, and ambition.
Growth benefiting only wealthier farmers and entrepreneurs and bottom 40% still in poverty trap.

Rural Economy Vs Urban Economy in India

Rural India presents a paradox with a rapid growth and a persistent inequality:

Growth trajectory is genuine but insufficient.
Abandonment is not intentional but structural. Rural infrastructure investment is substantial but can’t keep pace with urbanization rate.
The real issue is distribution inequality. Rural growth is concentrating among better-off farmers and entrepreneurs and bottom 40% are largely excluded.
Geography matters enormously, like Kerala and Karnataka show successful rural-urban integration, but Bihar and UP show continued severe gaps.

The challenge going forward: Policy must shift from broad rural schemes to targeted investment in poorest districts and marginalized rural communities. Rural women and youth need pathways to high-value work, and not just employment.

Rural India isn’t abandoned, but current development trajectory is too slow for equitable outcomes.